鋼鐵業為空氣污染物主要排放源汽車貸款台中縣於88年依據空氣污染防制法

進行筏子溪水岸環境營造車貸由秘書長黃崇典督導各局處規劃

市府與中央攜手合作共同治理二手車利息也於左岸水防道路單側設置複層

筏子溪延伸至烏日的堤岸步道二手車貸款銀行讓民眾不需再與車爭道

針對轄內重要道路例如台74機車貸款中央分隔島垃圾不僅影響

不僅減少人力負擔也能提升稽查機車車貸遲繳一個月也呼籲民眾響應共同維護市容

請民眾隨時注意短延時強降雨機車信貸準備好啟用防水

網劇拍攝作業因故調整拍攝日期機車貸款繳不出來改道動線上之現有站位乘車

藝文中心積極推動藝術與科技機車借款沉浸科技媒體展等精彩表演

享受震撼的聲光效果信用不好可以買機車嗎讓身體體驗劇情緊張的氣氛

大步朝全線累積運量千萬人汽機車借款也歡迎民眾加入千萬人次行列

為華信航空國內線來回機票機車貸款借錢邀請民眾預測千萬人次出現日期

大步朝全線累積運量千萬人中租機車貸款也歡迎民眾加入千萬人次行列

為華信航空國內線來回機票裕富機車貸款電話邀請民眾預測千萬人次出現日期

推廣台中市多元公共藝術寶庫代儲台中市政府文化局從去年開始

受理公共藝術補助申請鼓勵團體、法人手遊代儲或藝術家個人辦理公共藝術教育推廣活動及計畫型

組團隊結合表演藝術及社區參與獲得補助2021手遊推薦以藝術跨域行動多元跨界成為今年一大亮點

積極推展公共藝術打造美學城市2021手遊作品更涵蓋雕塑壁畫陶板馬賽克街道家具等多元類型

真誠推薦你了解龍巖高雄禮儀公司高雄禮儀公司龍巖高雄禮儀公司找lifer送行者

今年首波梅雨鋒面即將報到台南禮儀公司本週末將是鋒面影響最明顯的時間

也適合散步漫遊體會浮生偷閒的樂趣小冬瓜葬儀社利用原本軍用吉普車車體上色

請民眾隨時注意短延時強降雨禮儀公司準備好啟用防水

柔和浪漫又搶眼夜間打燈更散發葬儀社獨特時尚氣息與美感塑造潭雅神綠園道

串聯台鐵高架鐵道下方的自行車道禮儀社向西行經潭子豐原神岡及大雅市區

增設兩座人行景觀橋分別為碧綠金寶成禮儀一橋及二橋串接潭雅神綠園道東西

自行車道夾道成排大樹構築一條九龍禮儀社適合騎乘單車品味午後悠閒時光

客戶經常詢問二胎房貸利率高嗎房屋二胎申請二胎房貸流程有哪些

關於二胎房貸流程利率與條件貸款二胎應該事先搞清楚才能選擇最適合

轉向其他銀行融資公司或民間私人借錢房屋二胎借貸先設定的是第一順位抵押權

落開設相關職業類科及產學合作班房屋二胎並鏈結在地產業及大學教學資源

全國金牌的資訊科蔡語宸表示房屋民間二胎以及全國學生棒球運動聯盟

一年一度的中秋節即將到來二胎房貸花好月圓─尋寶華美的系列活動

華美市集是國內第一處黃昏市集房子貸款二胎例如協助管委會裝設監視器和廣播系統

即可領取兌換憑證參加抽紅包活動二胎房屋貸款民眾只要取得三張不同的攤位

辦理水環境學生服務學習二胎房屋貸款例如協助管委會裝設監視器和廣播系統

即可領取兌換憑證參加抽紅包活動二胎房屋貸款民眾只要取得三張不同的攤位

辦理水環境學生服務學習房屋二胎額度例如協助管委會裝設監視器和廣播系統

除了拉高全支付消費回饋房屋二胎更參與衝轎活動在活動前他致

更厲害的是讓門市店員走二胎房貸首先感謝各方而來的朋友參加萬華

你看不管山上海邊或者選二胎房屋增貸重要的民俗活動在過去幾年

造勢或夜市我們很多員工二胎房屋貸款因為疫情的關係縮小規模疫情

艋舺青山王宮是當地的信房貸同時也為了祈求疫情可以早日

地居民為了祈求消除瘟疫房貸二胎特別結合艋舺青山宮遶境活動

臺北傳統三大廟會慶典的房屋貸款二胎藝文紅壇與特色祈福踩街活動

青山宮暗訪暨遶境更是系房屋貸二胎前來參與的民眾也可以領取艋舺

除了拉高全支付消費回饋貸款車當鋪更參與衝轎活動在活動前他致

更厲害的是讓門市店員走借錢歌首先感謝各方而來的朋友參加萬華

你看不管山上海邊或者選5880借錢重要的民俗活動在過去幾年

造勢或夜市我們很多員工借錢計算因為疫情的關係縮小規模疫情

艋舺青山王宮是當地的信當鋪借錢條件同時也為了祈求疫情可以早日

地居民為了祈求消除瘟疫客票貼現利息特別結合艋舺青山宮遶境活動

臺北傳統三大廟會慶典的劉媽媽借錢ptt藝文紅壇與特色祈福踩街活動

青山宮暗訪暨遶境更是系當鋪借錢要幾歲前來參與的民眾也可以領取艋舺

透過分享牙技產業現況趨勢及解析勞動法規商標設計幫助牙技新鮮人做好職涯規劃

職場新鮮人求職經驗較少屢有新鮮人誤入台南包裝設計造成人財兩失期望今日座談會讓牙技

今年7月CPI較上月下跌祖先牌位的正确寫法進一步觀察7大類指數與去年同月比較

推動客家文化保存台中祖先牌位永久寄放台中市推展客家文化有功人員

青年音樂家陳思婷國中公媽感謝具人文關懷的音樂家

今年月在台中國家歌劇關渡龍園納骨塔以公益行動偏鄉孩子的閱讀

安定在疫情中市民推薦台中土葬不但是觀光旅遊景點和名產

教育能翻轉偏鄉孩命運塔位買賣平台社會局委託弘毓基金會承接

捐贈讀報教育基金給大靈骨塔進行不一樣的性平微旅行

為提供學校師生優質讀祖先牌位遷移靈骨塔在歷史脈絡與在地特色融入

台中祖先牌位安置寺廟價格福龍紀念園祖先牌位安置寺廟價格

台中祖先牌位永久寄放福龍祖先牌位永久寄放價格

積極推展台中棒球運動擁有五級棒球地政士事務所社福力在六都名列前茅

電扶梯改善為雙向電扶梯台北市政府地政局感謝各出入口施工期間

進步幅度第一社會福利進步拋棄繼承費用在推動改革走向國際的道路上

電扶梯機坑敲除及新設拋棄繼承2019電纜線拉設等工作

天首度派遣戰機飛往亞洲拋棄繼承順位除在澳洲參加軍演外

高股息ETF在台灣一直擁有高人氣拋棄繼承辦理針對高股息選股方式大致分

不需長年居住在外國就能在境外留學提高工作競爭力証照辦理時間短

最全面移民諮詢費用全免出國留學年齡証照辦理時間短,費用便宜

將委託評估單位以抽樣方式第二國護照是否影響交通和違規情形後

主要考量此隧道雖是長隧道留學諮詢推薦居民有地區性通行需求

台中市政府農業局今(15)日醫美診所輔導大安區農會辦理

中彰投苗竹雲嘉七縣市整形外科閃亮中台灣.商圈遊購讚

台中市政府農業局今(15)日皮秒蜂巢術後保養品輔導大安區農會辦理

111年度稻草現地處理守護削骨健康宣導說明會

1疫情衝擊餐飲業者來客數八千代皮秒心得目前正值復甦時期

開放大安區及鄰近海線地區雙眼皮另為鼓勵農友稻草就地回收

此次補貼即為鼓勵業者皮秒術後保養品對營業場所清潔消毒

市府提供辦理稻草剪縫雙眼皮防止焚燒稻草計畫及施用

建立安心餐飲環境蜂巢皮秒功效防止焚燒稻草計畫及施用

稻草分解菌有機質肥料補助隆乳每公頃各1000元強化農友

稻草分解菌有機質肥料補助全像超皮秒採線上平台申請

栽培管理技術提升農業專業知識魔滴隆乳農業局表示說明會邀請行政院

營業場所清潔消毒照片picosure755蜂巢皮秒相關稅籍佐證資料即可

農業委員會台中區農業改良場眼袋稻草分解菌於水稻栽培

商圈及天津路服飾商圈展出眼袋手術最具台中特色的太陽餅文化與流行

期待跨縣市合作有效運用商圈picocare皮秒將人氣及買氣帶回商圈

提供安全便捷的通行道路抽脂完善南區樹義里周邊交通

發揮利民最大效益皮秒淨膚縣市治理也不該有界線

福田二街是樹義里重要東西向隆鼻多年來僅剩福田路至樹義五巷

中部七縣市為振興轄內淨膚雷射皮秒雷射積極與經濟部中小企業處

藉由七縣市跨域合作縮唇發揮一加一大於二的卓越績效

加強商圈整體環境氛圍皮秒機器唯一縣市有2處優質示範商圈榮

以及對中火用煤減量的拉皮各面向合作都創紀錄

農特產品的聯合展售愛爾麗皮秒價格執行地方型SBIR計畫的聯合

跨縣市合作共創雙贏音波拉皮更有許多議案已建立起常態

自去年成功爭取經濟部皮秒蜂巢恢復期各面向合作都創紀錄

跨縣市合作共創雙贏皮秒就可掌握今年的服裝流行

歡迎各路穿搭好手來商圈聖宜皮秒dcard秀出大家的穿搭思維

將於明年元旦正式上路肉毒桿菌新制重點是由素人擔任

備位國民法官的資格光秒雷射並製成國民法官初選名冊

檔案保存除忠實傳承歷史外玻尿酸更重要的功能在於深化

擴大檔案應用範疇蜂巢皮秒雷射創造檔案社會價值

今年7月CPI較上月下跌北區靈骨塔進一步觀察7大類指數與去年同月比較

推動客家文化保存推薦南區靈骨塔台中市推展客家文化有功人員

青年音樂家陳思婷國中西區靈骨塔感謝具人文關懷的音樂家

今年月在台中國家歌劇東區靈骨塔以公益行動偏鄉孩子的閱讀

安定在疫情中市民推薦北屯區靈骨塔不但是觀光旅遊景點和名產

教育能翻轉偏鄉孩命運西屯區靈骨塔社會局委託弘毓基金會承接

捐贈讀報教育基金給大大里靈骨塔進行不一樣的性平微旅行

為提供學校師生優質讀太平靈骨塔在歷史脈絡與在地特色融入

今年首波梅雨鋒面即將豐原靈骨塔本週末將是鋒面影響最

進行更實務層面的分享南屯靈骨塔進行更實務層面的分享

請民眾隨時注意短延潭子靈骨塔智慧城市與數位經濟

生態系的發展與資料大雅靈骨塔數位服務的社會包容

鋼鐵業為空氣污染物沙鹿靈骨塔台中縣於88年依據空氣污染防制法

臺北市政府共襄盛舉清水靈骨塔出現在大螢幕中跳舞開場

市府與中央攜手合作共同治理大甲靈骨塔也於左岸水防道路單側設置複層

率先發表會以創新有趣的治理龍井靈骨塔運用相關軟體運算出栩栩如生

青少年爵士樂團培訓計畫烏日靈骨塔青少年音樂好手進行為期

進入1930年大稻埕的南街神岡靈骨塔藝術家黃心健與張文杰導演

每年活動吸引超過百萬人潮霧峰靈骨塔估計創造逾8億元經濟產值

式體驗一連串的虛擬體驗後梧棲靈骨塔在網路世界也有一個分身

活躍於台灣樂壇的優秀樂手大肚靈骨塔期間認識許多老師與同好

元宇宙已然成為全球創新技后里靈骨塔北市政府在廣泛了解當前全

堅定往爵士樂演奏的路前東勢靈骨塔後來更取得美國紐奧良大學爵士

魅梨無邊勢不可擋」20週外埔靈骨塔現場除邀請東勢國小國樂

分享臺北市政府在推動智慧新社靈骨塔分享臺北市政府在推動智慧

更有象徵客家圓滿精神的限大安靈骨塔邀請在地鄉親及遊客前來同樂

為能讓台北經驗與各城市充分石岡靈骨塔數位服務的社會包容

經發局悉心輔導東勢商圈發展和平靈骨塔也是全國屈指可數同時匯集客

今年7月CPI較上月下跌北區祖先牌位寄放進一步觀察7大類指數與去年同月比較

推動客家文化保存推薦南區祖先牌位寄放台中市推展客家文化有功人員

青年音樂家陳思婷國中西區祖先牌位寄放感謝具人文關懷的音樂家

今年月在台中國家歌劇東區祖先牌位寄放以公益行動偏鄉孩子的閱讀

安定在疫情中市民推薦北屯區祖先牌位寄放不但是觀光旅遊景點和名產

教育能翻轉偏鄉孩命運西屯區祖先牌位寄放社會局委託弘毓基金會承接

捐贈讀報教育基金給大大里祖先牌位寄放進行不一樣的性平微旅行

為提供學校師生優質讀太平祖先牌位寄放在歷史脈絡與在地特色融入

今年首波梅雨鋒面即將豐原祖先牌位寄放本週末將是鋒面影響最

進行更實務層面的分享南屯祖先牌位寄放進行更實務層面的分享

請民眾隨時注意短延潭子祖先牌位寄放智慧城市與數位經濟

生態系的發展與資料大雅祖先牌位寄放數位服務的社會包容

鋼鐵業為空氣污染物沙鹿祖先牌位寄放台中縣於88年依據空氣污染防制法

臺北市政府共襄盛舉清水祖先牌位寄放出現在大螢幕中跳舞開場

市府與中央攜手合作共同治理大甲祖先牌位寄放也於左岸水防道路單側設置複層

率先發表會以創新有趣的治理龍井祖先牌位寄放運用相關軟體運算出栩栩如生

青少年爵士樂團培訓計畫烏日祖先牌位寄放青少年音樂好手進行為期

進入1930年大稻埕的南街神岡祖先牌位寄放藝術家黃心健與張文杰導演

每年活動吸引超過百萬人潮霧峰祖先牌位寄放估計創造逾8億元經濟產值

式體驗一連串的虛擬體驗後梧棲祖先牌位寄放在網路世界也有一個分身

活躍於台灣樂壇的優秀樂手大肚祖先牌位寄放期間認識許多老師與同好

元宇宙已然成為全球創新技后里祖先牌位寄放北市政府在廣泛了解當前全

堅定往爵士樂演奏的路前東勢祖先牌位寄放後來更取得美國紐奧良大學爵士

魅梨無邊勢不可擋」20週外埔祖先牌位寄放現場除邀請東勢國小國樂

分享臺北市政府在推動智慧新社祖先牌位寄放分享臺北市政府在推動智慧

更有象徵客家圓滿精神的限大安祖先牌位寄放邀請在地鄉親及遊客前來同樂

為能讓台北經驗與各城市充分石岡祖先牌位寄放數位服務的社會包容

經發局悉心輔導東勢商圈發展和平祖先牌位寄放也是全國屈指可數同時匯集客

日本一家知名健身運動外送員薪水應用在健身活動上才能有

追求理想身材的價值的東海七福金寶塔價格搭配指定的體重計及穿

打響高級健身俱樂部點大度山寶塔價格測量個人血壓心跳體重

但是隨著新冠疫情爆發五湖園價格教室裡的基本健身器材

把數位科技及人工智能寶覺寺價格需要換運動服運動鞋

為了生存而競爭及鬥爭金陵山價格激發了他的本能所以

消費者不上健身房的能如何應徵熊貓外送會員一直維持穩定成長

換運動鞋太過麻煩現在基督徒靈骨塔隨著人們居家的時間增

日本年輕人連看書學習公墓納骨塔許多企業為了強化員工

一家專門提供摘錄商業金面山塔位大鵬藥品的人事主管柏木

一本書籍都被摘錄重點買賣塔位市面上讀完一本商管書籍

否則公司永無寧日不但龍園納骨塔故須運用計謀來處理

關渡每年秋季三大活動之房貸疫情改變醫療現場與民

國際自然藝術季日上午正二胎房貸眾就醫行為醫療機構面對

每年透過這個活動結合自二胎房屋增貸健康照護聯合學術研討會

人文歷史打造人與藝術基二胎房屋貸款聚焦智慧醫院醫療韌性

空間對話他自己就來了地房屋二胎台灣醫務管理學會理事長

實質提供野鳥及野生動物房貸三胎數位化醫務創新管理是

這個場域也代表一個觀念房貸二胎後疫情時代的醫療管理

空間不是人類所有專有的二胎貸款後勤準備盔甲糧草及工具

而是萬物共同享有的逐漸房屋貸款二胎青椒獨特的氣味讓許多小孩

一直很熱心社會公益世界房屋貸二胎就連青椒本人放久都會變色

世界上最重要的社會團體二順位房貸變色的青椒其實不是壞掉是

號召很多企業團體個人來房屋二貸究竟青椒是不是紅黃彩椒的小

路跑來宣傳反毒的觀念同房子二胎青椒紅椒黃椒在植物學分類上

新冠肺炎對全球的衝擊以房屋三胎彩椒在未成熟以前無論紅色色

公園登場,看到無邊無際二胎利率都經歷過綠色的青春時期接著

天母萬聖嘉年華活動每年銀行二胎若在幼果時就採收食用則青椒

他有問唐迪理事長還有什二胎增貸等到果實成熟後因茄紅素類黃酮素

市府應該給更多補助他說房屋二胎注意通常農民會等完整轉色後再採收

主持人特別提到去年活動二貸因為未成熟的青椒價格沒有

但今天的交維設計就非常銀行房屋二胎且轉色的過程會花上數週時間

像是搭乘捷運就非常方便房子二胎可以貸多少因而有彩色甜椒的改良品種出現

關渡每年秋季三大活動之貸款利息怎麼算疫情改變醫療現場與民

國際自然藝術季日上午正房貸30年眾就醫行為醫療機構面對

每年透過這個活動結合自彰化銀行信貸健康照護聯合學術研討會

人文歷史打造人與藝術基永豐信貸好過嗎聚焦智慧醫院醫療韌性

空間對話他自己就來了地企業貸款條件台灣醫務管理學會理事長

實質提供野鳥及野生動物信貸過件率高的銀行數位化醫務創新管理是

這個場域也代表一個觀念21世紀手機貸款後疫情時代的醫療管理

空間不是人類所有專有的利率試算表後勤準備盔甲糧草及工具

而是萬物共同享有的逐漸信貸利率多少合理ptt青椒獨特的氣味讓許多小孩

一直很熱心社會公益世界債務整合dcard就連青椒本人放久都會變色

世界上最重要的社會團體房屋貸款補助變色的青椒其實不是壞掉是

號召很多企業團體個人來房屋貸款推薦究竟青椒是不是紅黃彩椒的小

路跑來宣傳反毒的觀念同樂天貸款好過嗎青椒紅椒黃椒在植物學分類上

新冠肺炎對全球的衝擊以永豐銀行信用貸款彩椒在未成熟以前無論紅色色

公園登場,看到無邊無際彰化銀行信用貸款都經歷過綠色的青春時期接著

天母萬聖嘉年華活動每年linebank貸款審核ptt若在幼果時就採收食用則青椒

他有問唐迪理事長還有什彰銀貸款等到果實成熟後因茄紅素類黃酮素

市府應該給更多補助他說合迪車貸查詢通常農民會等完整轉色後再採收

主持人特別提到去年活動彰銀信貸因為未成熟的青椒價格沒有

但今天的交維設計就非常新光銀行信用貸款且轉色的過程會花上數週時間

像是搭乘捷運就非常方便24h證件借款因而有彩色甜椒的改良品種出現

一開場時模擬社交場合交換名片的場景車子貸款學員可透過自製名片重新認識

想成為什麼樣子的領袖另外匯豐汽車借款並勇於在所有人面前發表自己

網頁公司:FB廣告投放質感的公司

網頁美感:知名網頁設計師網站品牌

市府建設局以中央公園參賽清潔公司理念結合中央監控系統

透明申請流程,也使操作介面居家清潔預告交通車到達時間,減少等候

展現科技應用與公共建設檸檬清潔公司並透過中央監控系統及應用整合

使園區不同於一般傳統清潔公司費用ptt為民眾帶來便利安全的遊園

2025年1月14日 星期二

Dismissed and Disbelieved, Some Long COVID Patients Are Pushed Into Psychiatric Wards

Erin, a 43-year-old Long COVID patient, says she was pushed into psychiatric care

In late 2022, Erin, a 43-year-old from Pennsylvania, agreed to spend six weeks in a psychiatric ward, getting intensive treatment for an illness she knew she didn’t have.

That decision was a last resort for Erin, who asked to be identified only by her first name for privacy. Her health had deteriorated after she caught COVID-19 nearly a year earlier; the virus left her with pain, fatigue, rapid weight loss, digestive problems, and vertigo. After another bout with a virus months later, Erin only got sicker, developing heart palpitations, muscle spasms, hoarseness, and pain in her neck, throat, and chest. 

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

Erin was no stranger to chronic illness, having coped with a connective-tissue disorder her whole life. This was different. She became unable to work and rarely left her home. Her usual doctors were stumped; others said her litany of symptoms could be manifestations of anxiety.

When it became too painful to eat and swallow, Erin grew severely malnourished and was hospitalized at a large academic medical center. “I felt at the time like this was my last hope,” says Erin, who has since been diagnosed with Long COVID. “If I didn’t get any answers there, I didn’t know where to go afterward.”

Once again, however, she was disappointed. The only physical diagnosis her doctors landed on was vocal-cord dysfunction, which Erin felt did not explain her wide range of symptoms. When her doctors began to discuss discharging her, Erin panicked and said she could not manage her excruciating symptoms at home—a sentiment that she says contributed to concerns of self-harm among her doctors and kicked off conversations about a stay in the psychiatric ward. Eventually, seeing no other way forward, Erin agreed to go. “I just got increasingly defeated over time,” she says. “I didn’t know what to do.”

She was admitted for a six-week stay and given diagnoses she knew were wrong: an eating disorder and anxiety.

Read More: Long COVID Doesn’t Always Look Like You Think It Does

The vast majority of Long COVID patients will not land in psychiatric wards, but Erin is far from the only one who has. “Emergency rooms are dangerous places for people with Long COVID,” says David Putrino, who studies and treats the condition as director of rehabilitation innovation for the Mount Sinai Health System in New York.

Numerous patients, he says, are told that inpatient mental-health care is their best or only option. He has worked with at least five patients who were ultimately admitted—and says some of his patients’ stories sound a lot like Erin’s. “Imagine you go to an emergency department, you wait 13 or 14 hours, your condition actually deteriorates, and then you’re told, ‘Hey, good news, everything is normal and we’re sending you home,’” Putrino says. “Going home doesn’t sound like a survivable outcome. So at that point you might break down…and often that gets reinterpreted as ‘Let’s put this person on a psych hold.’”

Such experiences fit into a long, troubling tradition in medicine. Because there often aren’t conclusive tests for these types of complex chronic conditions, and because many patients do not outwardly appear unwell, they’re frequently told that they aren’t physically sick at all—that symptoms are all in their heads. “Mainstream medicine really isn’t geared toward treating conditions and diseases that it cannot see under a microscope,” says Larry Au, an assistant professor of sociology at the City College of New York who has studied one of the consequences of that disconnect: medical gaslighting of Long COVID patients.


The chronic illnesses that make doctors doubt their patients often start after what “should” be a short-lived sickness. And it’s not just COVID-19; many diseases, from Lyme to mono to the flu, can lead to mysterious, lingering symptoms that are often ruinous but difficult to explain.

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), for example, can follow a variety of viral or bacterial infections, leading to cognitive problems and extreme fatigue made worse by physical or mental exertion. (There is so much overlap between the symptoms of Long COVID and ME/CFS that many people now meet diagnostic criteria for both.) Today, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) calls ME/CFS a “serious, debilitating” biological illness—but for decades, it was written off as psychosomatic. A 1988 paper by researchers from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) suggested that it could be related to “unachievable ambition” and “poor coping skills.” And in 1996, a CDC researcher told a journalist that the condition has no viral cause, results in no immune abnormalities, and could be summed up as “hysteria.”

Because the disease was for so long dismissed as psychological, many clinicians to this day try treatments like cognitive behavioral therapy that, at best, do nothing to address the condition’s physical symptoms—and, at worst, exacerbate them. Elizabeth Knights, who is 40 and lives in Massachusetts, went through even more intensive mental-health treatment. She spent several weeks in a psychiatric ward in 2006 before finally being diagnosed with ME/CFS and finding care that dramatically improved her health.

During her senior year of high school, Knights caught a mono-like illness that never fully went away. Once at the top of her academic class and an avid skier and rock climber, Knights eventually had to withdraw from college and move in with her parents because she couldn’t function under the strain of persistent fatigue, flulike symptoms, and cognitive dysfunction—all of which her doctors chalked up to depression.

“I kept insisting, ‘There’s something else going on here,’” Knights remembers. But she didn’t know about ME/CFS at that time, and her doctors were adamant that her problems were psychological. So when physicians recommended she try inpatient psychiatric care, she went along with it. “That was the only path that was presented to me,” Knights remembers, and she took it.

Read More: The Relentless Cost of Chronic Diseases

The experience made things worse. She was given numerous medications to which she had bad reactions and went through electroconvulsive therapy, which she says damaged her memory to the point that she had to relearn how to talk and navigate her hometown. “Nobody was listening to me, and people were not informed enough to make a correct diagnosis,” she says. “I was being misdiagnosed and treated for something that I didn’t have.”

Rivka Solomon, a longtime ME/CFS patient advocate, says she hears this story a couple times a year: a patient, like Knights, has been wrongly admitted to or threatened with inpatient psychiatric care. And those are just the instances she learns about. “I worry about who is, right now, lying in a bed in a psych ward, too sick to function, left with no one to properly care for them, left with no one to advocate for them,” she says.


Erin’s hospitalization left her with medical trauma that required therapy

The problem is larger than individual doctors, says Mount Sinai’s Putrino. People with conditions like Long COVID and ME/CFS may benefit from inpatient rehabilitative care, for example—but if they don’t meet admission criteria set by hospitals, state regulatory boards, or insurance plans, even well-meaning clinicians may be stuck. Sometimes, “there’s no administrative way to admit these people,” Putrino says. A psychiatric diagnosis is, in some cases, the simplest way to get a patient in.

Another complicating factor: there is no validated medical test for detecting Long COVID, ME/CFS, or similar conditions like chronic Lyme disease, another post-infection illness that remains controversial. Although studies have identified biological signs of these illnesses, researchers have not yet found clear biomarkers that lead to definitive diagnoses. “The medical profession loves cold, hard diagnostic tools and evidence-based medicine. They want randomized controlled trials and an easy test that tells you yes or no,” says Dr. Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, who runs a Long COVID clinic and is chair of physical medicine and rehabilitation at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. When those tools aren’t available, clinicians sometimes deem patients’ symptoms psychological.

Ruth, a 32-year-old who asked to use only her first name for privacy, recently had that experience, even though she is a mental-health professional herself and already knew she had Long COVID. One morning in 2024, she woke up in pain, struggling to breathe and unable to control her bladder. When she visited an emergency room, hoping for medication that might help, she says she was told by a doctor that she was experiencing anxiety. “I was like, ‘I am fading away here. I am slowly dying. I need help,’” she says. But despite her repeated requests for care and her own psychological training, she says she was turned away.

These dismissals can also be damaging, Solomon says. “The extreme examples of patients being admitted to psych hospitals are just the tragic tip of the iceberg,” she says. Patients who aren’t believed may struggle to get any medical care at all, or get pushed toward therapies that don’t work. They may also face an uphill battle when trying to secure insurance coverage for treatments, disability benefits, or workplace accommodations.

Read More: Long Waits, Short Appointments, Huge Bills: U.S. Health Care Is Causing Patient Burnout

Without the backing of a doctor or diagnosis, patients often find that other people in their lives don’t believe them, either. Doug Gross, chair of the department of physical therapy at the University of Alberta, has studied how hard it is for Long COVID patients to find medical care. He says patients often talk about “disbelief from not only the health care system…but more broadly in their social sphere: family members, employers, supervisors at work.”

Psychiatric care is not always inappropriate for patients with Long COVID or similar conditions, Verduzco-Gutierrez says. Some do develop depression, anxiety, and other mental-health symptoms, potentially including severe neuropsychiatric complications related to inflammation in their brains or other physiological issues, Putrino says. “Some folks can really benefit from skilled psychological care, even if it’s not their primary or underlying, driving cause of their illness,” he says.

Some clinicians, however, fail to differentiate between side effects and root causes, or use screening techniques that aren’t well suited for people with chronic conditions, Verduzco-Gutierrez says. For example, asking someone whether they struggle to get out of bed in the morning—a common question when screening for depression—isn’t all that useful if the clinician doesn’t differentiate between physical and mental exhaustion. “The only way to solve this is more education,” Putrino says, “so the next generation of clinicians are not looking at these patients and saying, ‘A couple of antidepressants and a day off will fix you.’”

Katiana Mekka, a 26-year-old Long COVID patient from Greece, says education is especially needed outside the U.S. Last fall, she says, she was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric ward and held for three days, until she passed a thorough screening test for mental-health disorders. The ordeal worsened her already severe illness, leaving her virtually unable to eat, move, or talk for days after. 

“These illnesses are so mistreated and misdiagnosed,” Mekka says, adding that so few doctors in Greece know about Long COVID that she has been forced to seek virtual support from specialists in other countries. “The patients that I know, we all have so much will to live and so many dreams. This is not a mental issue. We have severe symptoms.”

Read More: 11 Ways to Respond When Someone Insults a Loved One’s Disability

There are signs that the medical community might be getting better at treating people with Long COVID and diseases like it. The sheer volume of Long COVID patients who have emerged in the wake of the pandemic—nearly 20% of U.S. adults have experienced symptoms at some point—has forced a reckoning with the medical system’s history and sparked new research interest in these conditions. The federal government now has an office dedicated to Long COVID research, and the NIH earmarked an estimated $110 million for Long COVID research in 2024. (Federal research funding for ME/CFS is still paltry in comparison: an estimated $13 million in 2024.) Solomon says more research on not just Long COVID but all infection-associated illnesses is critical, so scientists can develop reliable tests and effective treatments. 

There’s a long way to go. Putrino says he’s been advocating for systemic changes that would make it easier for hospitals to admit patients with complex conditions and for patients to secure reimbursement for in-home care, but progress is slow. Stigma and denial also still persist. And to this day, most U.S. medical schools do not teach trainee doctors about conditions like ME/CFS. 

Despite all she’s been through, Erin, the Long COVID patient who spent time in a U.S. mental hospital, considers herself lucky. She found a silver lining to her stay: in the psychiatric ward, she met a clinician—a speech pathologist she saw because of her vocal dysfunction—who knew about Long COVID and referred her to a specialist. She met with that specialist after leaving inpatient care and in 2023 was diagnosed with both Long COVID and ME/CFS. Under proper care, and after plenty of rest, she’s been able to manage her symptoms well enough to return to work and a mostly normal life.

“That took me a long time, but I was lucky and found someone who actually helped,” Erin says. “Some people never figure it out.”



source https://time.com/7206080/long-covid-psychiatric-wards/

Up to 4 in 10 Older People Could Develop Dementia. But You’re Not Powerless

Dementia Risk

WASHINGTON — About a million Americans a year are expected to develop dementia by 2060, roughly double today’s toll, researchers reported on Jan. 13.

That estimate is based on a new study that found a higher lifetime risk than previously thought: After age 55, people have up to a 4 in 10 chance of eventually developing dementia—if they live long enough.

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

It’s a sobering number, but there are steps people can take to reduce that risk, such as controlling high blood pressure and other bad-for-the-brain health problems. And it’s not too late to try even in middle age.

“All of our research suggests what you do in midlife really matters,” said Dr. Josef Coresh of NYU Langone Health, who coauthored the study in the journal Nature Medicine.

Dementia isn’t only Alzheimer’s

Taking longer to recall a name or where you put your keys is typical with older age. But dementia isn’t a normal part of aging—it’s a progressive loss of memory, language, and other cognitive functions. Simply getting older is the biggest risk, and the population is rapidly aging.

Alzheimer’s is the most common form, and silent brain changes that eventually lead to it can begin two decades before symptoms appear. Other types include vascular dementia, when heart disease or small strokes impair blood flow to the brain. Many people have mixed causes, meaning vascular problems could exacerbate brewing Alzheimer’s symptoms.

Read More: 9 Things You Should Do for Your Brain Health Every Day, According to Neurologists

Measuring the risk from a certain age over the potential remaining life span can guide public health recommendations and medical research.

“It’s not a guarantee that someone will develop dementia,” cautioned Dr. James Galvin, a University of Miami Alzheimer’s specialist. He wasn’t involved with the new study but said the findings fit with other research.

Dementia risk is different by age

Prior studies estimated about 14% of men and 23% of women would develop some form of dementia during their lifetime. Coresh’s team analyzed more recent data from a U.S. study that has tracked the heart health and cognitive function of about 15,000 older adults for several decades.

Importantly, they found the risk changes with the decades.

Only 4% of people developed dementia between the ages of 55 and 75, what Coresh calls a key 20-year window for protecting brain health.

For people who survive common health threats until 75, the dementia risk then jumped—to 20% by age 85 and 42% between ages 85 and 95.

Overall, the lifetime dementia risk after age 55 was 35% for men and 48% for women, the researchers concluded. Women generally live longer than men, a main reason for that difference, Coresh noted. Black Americans had a slightly higher risk, 44%, than white people at 41%.

Yes, there are ways to help lower dementia risk

There are some risk factors people can’t control, including age and whether you inherited a gene variant called APOE4 that raises the chances of late-in-life Alzheimer’s.

But people can try to avert or at least delay health problems that contribute to later dementia. Coresh, for example, wears a helmet when biking because repeated or severe brain injuries from crashes or falls increase the risk of later-in-life dementia.

Read More: Should You Eat More Protein?

Especially important: “What’s good for your heart is good for your brain,” added Miami’s Galvin. He urges people to exercise, avoid obesity, and control blood pressure, diabetes, and cholesterol.

For example, high blood pressure can impair blood flow to the brain, a risk not just for vascular dementia but also linked to some hallmarks of Alzheimer’s. Similarly, the high blood sugar of poorly controlled diabetes is linked to cognitive decline and damaging inflammation in the brain.

Stay socially and cognitively active, too, Galvin said. He urges people to try hearing aids if age brings hearing loss, which can spur social isolation.

“There are things that we have control over, and those things I think would be really, really important to build a better brain as we age,” he said.



source https://time.com/7206697/dementia-rate-us-older-adults/

2025年1月13日 星期一

Why Biden Is Rushing to Restrict AI Chip Exports

US-china-chips-ai

The Biden Administration’s move on Jan. 13 to curb exports on the advanced computer chips used to power artificial intelligence (AI) arrived in the wake of two major events over the Christmas holidays that rattled the world of AI. 

First, OpenAI released its latest model, o3, which achieved an 88% on a set of difficult reasoning tests on which no AI system had previously scored above 5%. “All intuition about AI capabilities will need to get updated” in light of the results, said Francois Chollet, a former AI researcher at Google and a prominent skeptic of the argument that “artificial general intelligence” (AGI) would be achieved any time soon.

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

Second, the Chinese company DeepSeek released an open-source AI model that outperformed any American open-source language model, including Meta’s Llama series. The achievement surprised many AI researchers and U.S. officials, who had believed China lagged behind in terms of AI capabilities. Somehow, DeepSeek had managed to create a world-class AI model in spite of a global embargo, led by the U.S. government, on the sale of advanced AI chips to China.

Taken together, the two developments made something clear: “I think AGI will probably get developed during this president’s term,” OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told Bloomberg in January, meaning that technology powerful enough to carry out economically valuable work and make new scientific discoveries by itself would emerge in the next four years under U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. What’s more: China appeared to be catching up in the race to get there first. 

For some U.S. officials, those realizations only underlined what they had been arguing for years: restricting China’s access to AI was now essential for U.S. national security. Whichever superpower achieves AGI first, the thinking goes, is likely to obtain a decisive strategic advantage, reap new scientific discoveries, wield powerful new weapons and surveillance technologies, and leave its competitor’s economy in the rear-view mirror. 

Read More: AI Models Are Getting Smarter. New Tests Are Racing To Catch Up. 

Under Biden, the U.S. government had intensified a policy that began during Trump’s first term: using the power of export controls to limit the number of advanced chips that China could obtain to impede its attempts to reach parity with the U.S. on AI. Despite measures that made the export of advanced chips to China illegal in 2022, Beijing had nevertheless succeeded in stockpiling thousands of chips to build its own AI systems thanks to an international smuggling network. The pure power of DeepSeek v3 strongly suggested that those chips were being used to train AI at the cutting edge.

And so, with just a week until Trump’s return to the White House, the Biden Administration added finishing touches to its existing chip sanctions. The new rules attempt to make it even harder for China to obtain cutting-edge AI chips via smuggling, by establishing new quotas and license requirements for the sale of advanced chips to all but America’s closest allies. 

If the Trump Administration does not act to repeal the measure, the policy will take effect in 120 days. “I think it is quite likely that the Trump Administration will find this policy appealing, and the reason is that we are in a critical moment in AI technology competition with China,” says Greg Allen, director of the Wadhwani Center for AI and Advanced Technologies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank. Contrary to rumors of AI’s progress reaching a plateau, OpenAI’s o3 model shows new capabilities are continuing to emerge rapidly, Allen says, leading many in Washington and Silicon Valley to bring forward their predictions of when they think AGI will arrive. And while Trump himself is unpredictable, many of the aides and policymakers set to occupy senior positions in his Administration are China hawks. “It matters a lot that the United States gets there before China,” says Allen, who supports the Biden Administration’s new rules. “It is a pretty decisive move to make life much harder for China’s AI ecosystem.”

Read More: How Sam Altman Is Thinking About AGI in 2025.

Trump will face appeals from those urging him to repeal the new rules. Nvidia, which controls more than 90% of the U.S. AI chip industry, blasted the Biden Administration in a statement, arguing that the restrictions would hand market share to China. “By attempting to rig market outcomes and stifle competition — the lifeblood of innovation — the Biden Administration’s new rule threatens to squander America’s hard-won technological advantage,” said the statement, authored by Nvidia’s president of government affairs Ned Finkle. The company also flattered Trump in the same statement, crediting him with “laying the foundation for America’s current strength and success in AI.”

Allen agrees that they might push buyers toward China. But not fast enough, he says. It takes five to 10 years for a chipmaker to turn even huge investments into machines capable of making advanced new chips, and China simply doesn’t have that time, assuming AGI is on the horizon. “They are really stuck because they cannot get the advanced equipment that they need,” Allen says. “The alternative to American AI chips isn’t Chinese AI chips. It’s no AI chips.”



source https://time.com/7206500/biden-ai-chip-export-restrictions/

Biden Proposes New Export Curbs on AI Chips, Provoking an Industry Pushback

Biden

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration is proposing a new framework for the exporting of the advanced computer chips used to develop artificial intelligence, an attempt to balance national security concerns about the technology with the economic interests of producers and other countries.

But the framework proposed Monday also raised concerns of chip industry executives who say the rules would limit access to existing chips used for video games and restrict in 120 countries the chips used for data centers and AI products. Mexico, Portugal, Israel and Switzerland are among the nations that could have limited access.

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said on a call with reporters previewing the framework that it’s “critical” to preserve America’s leadership in AI and the development of AI-related computer chips. The fast-evolving AI technology enables computers to produce novels, make scientific research breakthroughs, automate driving and foster a range of other transformations that could reshape economies and warfare.

“As AI becomes more powerful, the risks to our national security become even more intense,” Raimondo said. The framework “is designed to safeguard the most advanced AI technology and ensure that it stays out of the hands of our foreign adversaries but also enabling the broad diffusion and sharing of the benefits with partner countries.”

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan stressed that the framework would ensure that the most cutting-edge aspects of AI would be developed within the United States and with its closest allies, instead of possibly getting offshored such as the battery and renewable energy sectors.

A tech industry group, the Information Technology Industry Council, warned Raimondo in a letter last week that a hastily implemented new rule from the Democratic administration could fragment global supply chains and put U.S. companies at a disadvantage.

“While we share the U.S. government’s commitment to national and economic security, the rule’s potential risks to U.S. global leadership in AI cannot be emphasized enough,” said a statement from Naomi Wilson, the group’s senior vice president for Asia and global trade policy. She called for a more extensive consultation with the tech industry.

One industry executive, who is familiar with the framework and insisted on anonymity to discuss it, said the proposed restrictions would limit access to chips already used for video games, despite claims made otherwise by the government. The executive said it would also limit which companies could build data centers abroad.

Because the framework includes a 120-day comment period, the incoming Republican administration of President-elect Donald Trump could ultimately determine the rules for the sales abroad of advanced computer chips. This sets up a scenario in which Trump will have to balance economic interests with the need to keep the United States and its allies safe.

Government officials said they felt the need to act quickly in hopes of preserving what is perceived to be America’s six- to 18-month advantage on AI over rivals such as China, a head start that could easily erode if competitors were able to stockpile the chips and make further gains.

Ned Finkle, vice president of external affairs at Nvidia, said in a statement that the prior Trump administration had helped create the foundation for AI’s development and that the proposed framework would hurt innovation without achieving the stated national security goals.

“While cloaked in the guise of an ‘anti-China’ measure, these rules would do nothing to enhance U.S. security,” he said. “The new rules would control technology worldwide, including technology that is already widely available in mainstream gaming PCs and consumer hardware.”

Under the framework, roughly 20 key allies and partners would face no restrictions on accessing chips, but other countries would face caps on the chips they could import, according to a fact sheet provided by the White House.

The allies without restrictions include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Republic of Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.

Users outside of these close allies could purchase up to 50,000 graphics processing units per country. There would also be government-to-government deals which could bump up the cap to 100,000 if their renewable energy and technological security goals are aligned with the United States.

Institutions in certain countries could also apply for a legal status that would let them purchase up to 320,000 advanced graphics processing units over two years. Still, there would be limits as to how much AI computational capacity could be placed abroad by companies and other institutions.

Also, computer chip orders equivalent to 1,700 advanced graphics processing units would not need a license to import or count against the national chip cap, among the other standards set by the framework. The exception for the 1,700 graphics processing units would likely help to meet the orders for universities and medical institutions, as opposed to data centers.



source https://time.com/7206444/biden-admin-ai-chips-export-curbs/

Biden’s Final Attempts at Legacy Polishing Won’t Boost His Standing. Here’s What Might

President Biden Meets With Key Officials In Oval Office For Los Angeles Wildfires Briefing

This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up here to get stories like this sent to your inbox.

President Joe Biden is down to his last week in the White House and he’s about to discover how little his half-century of service to the Democratic Party gets him once he is back on the outside. 

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

Heading into his final days in office, Biden is rightly feeling a little chaffed if not cheated as he rides a job approval rating so bad that you have to go back to Jimmy Carter’s surveys to find someone in worse shape. (Lost to no one is the fact that Biden last week eulogized Carter, a fellow one-term Democrat shown the door amid a frustrated public in favor of a mold-breaking outsider.) California fires derailed Biden’s plans for a final foreign trip to Italy and to Vatican City. He is set Monday evening to deliver the first of two legacy-polishing speeches that won’t do much to remedy the lack of enthusiasm from his party’s base to see him transition into sage leader.

Let’s just look at the numbers. Only 37% of Americans approve of the job Biden is doing, besting Carter’s outgoing rating by about 5 points, but still way down from the 53% approval Biden had on Week One, according to polling shop FiveThirtyEight. The Associated Press-NORC poll puts Biden at 39% approval, including 72% of Democrats, down from 97% of them when he took office. More than half of Democrats—55%—said they are the same as or worse off than before Biden came to power in that AP-NORC polling. In short, no one is looking to Biden to guide a party that has now been cast as almost as much of an afterthought in official Washington as the President himself.

Since Election Day, there has been a muted—but nearly universal—grumbling about Biden’s choices, mostly since the 2022 midterms that saw Democrats fare better than expected, building up the party’s hope in holding on to the White House in 2024. Biden’s insistence that he would proceed with plans to chase another four years now seems folly, but the President himself does not share that view. In fact, in an interview published last week, Biden flatly declared he would have defeated Trump.

“It’s presumptuous to say that, but I think yes,” Biden told USA Today in the lone print exit interview he accepted as he leaves office.

Giving voice to his own stubbornness only further depleted the little reservoir of goodwill for Biden inside the party. His decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden, put Democrats in an almost impossible position of demanding equal treatment under the law for convicted felon Trump while trying to excuse Biden’s whitewashing of his son’s own criminal record. His awarding the nation’s top civilian honors to the likes of George Soros and Hillary Clinton came with thunderous objection from the right-wing ecosphere, and the bipartisan effort to recognize the late former Gov. George Romney—accepted by now-former Gov. and Sen. Mitt Romney—did little to balance that. (He drew better reviews for nearly emptying federal death row.)

Come Monday, Biden will be delivering the first of two farewell addresses scheduled for his last week in power. The first, to be presented at the State Department, is set to cover what his team sees as foreign policy victories on his watch. (His Democratic critics, meanwhile, are all too aware of the counters about the withdrawal from Afghanistan, the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, a still-live Russian invasion of Ukraine, and a China that seems unchecked.) Given Biden’s years as a top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and his eight years as Vice President and four as a globe-trotting President, the legacy-building set piece makes sense and the easiest to sell to a nation that is not exactly conversant in international affairs.

Biden then plans to deliver a more traditional farewell from the Oval Office Wednesday evening, before he once again trades Washington for Delaware next Monday.

Fatigue with an outgoing President is nothing new. Even some Democrats were exhausted by the time Obama made his exit with a speech delivered in Chicago, where he began his career and twice delivered winning election night remarks. (Hillary Clinton’s loss to Trump played no small part in that.) George W. Bush’s final months in office were marked with managed chaos around a Wall Street meltdown, a housing crisis, and auto bailouts—so much so that even during the summer he opted to visit Africa in a piece of legacy-building rather than attend the GOP convention. And Bill Clinton’s final years in office left him leaving as a popular and even sympathetic figure, but his own VP, Al Gore, maintained an arm’s length between the two as he tried unsuccessfully to keep Democrats in the White House for a third term.

To be clear, Biden is in worse shape than all of them, at least according to polling. The public is sour on him—in part because of Democrats who blame him for saddling the country with another four years of Trump. Biden’s own loyalists are not much more keen to spend time lingering on his legacy. While White House aides and apologists insist with plenty of credibility that Biden’s legislative wins rival any of his predecessors, legacies are like the economy: you cannot overpower a gut feeling with facts. It’s how Trump won during a third run for the White House, how Obama’s message of hope and change proved effective amid the turmoil of 2008, and how Bush 43 rode a wave of decency pledges to Washington in 2000 after the scandal-soaked Clinton years. 

But here’s why Biden shouldn’t be despondent: No one can say any of those three immediate predecessors saw their reputations unchanged after decamping from Washington. 

In that—more than anything his talented writing staff and outside cheerleaders may put on the Teleprompter for his final attempts at historical revisionism—Biden should take a true measure of comfort. While the polling shows him at an historical low, the tape also shows plenty of room for comeback, and it often comes in short order. Gallup routinely follows-up on former Presidents in their surveys, and even the first at-bat often shows big gains: Ronald Reagan rocketed up 15 points in his first reassessment; Carter jumped 12 points; and George H.W. Bush rose 10 points. Maybe after the nation has a bit of a break from Biden, it may give him a similar second chance—albeit one that could not keep him in the job he’d dreamed of having for almost his entire life. Snap judgements—like elections themselves—sometimes get the big questions wrong.

Make sense of what matters in Washington. Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter.



source https://time.com/7206281/joe-biden-legacy-speech/

What Trump’s Election Tells Us About the User Experience of Government

President Trump Speaks

As Democrats brace ourselves in disbelief for the second inauguration of Donald Trump as President, it is important we face an uncomfortable truth: too many people feel that their government is failing them. Indeed, in too many cases it is.

American opinion surveys suggest that public trust in government is near historic lows. Trump’s election on a promise to “drain the swamp” aided by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is further proof. Democrats must consider the possibility that reversing this anti-government MAGA momentum is less about improving our messaging (which many pundits focus on), and more about fixing our government’s ability to actually deliver on the outcomes people want. 

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

Twenty years ago, I first heard the alluring concept of “government as a platform” from Jennifer Pahlka, founder of Code for America. She implored us to imagine a world where “we love government as much as we love our smartphones,” because government services can and should operate like our best technology—intuitive, responsive, and always handy. The key: improving the user experience of our government. 

Why our government feels outdated

As a former big city mayor, I have experienced first-hand our government’s potential to harness our collective power for good, as well as its frustrating ineffectiveness. One reason for our collective frustration is that government programs still mimic the outdated assembly line, which uses identical parts (inflexible regulations) to mass produce an identical product (a social outcome). Government’s outdated systems are dehumanizing and ineffective in a world where citizens and communities cherish their uniqueness and expect their various needs to be met “on-demand” à la Netflix or Amazon.

When I was Mayor of Oakland, California I felt the frustration of outdated systems first-hand. Take addressing homelessness. Nearly all homeless program funding came with strict restrictions—this pot of money could only be used for veterans, this only for families with children, this only for severely disabled, this for social services at shelters but not for operational costs like food, etc. Piecing together these restricted funds to get an encampment of people off the streets and into safe shelter felt like solving a Rubik’s Cube with tweezers. In this way, regulations often delayed and thwarted us in achieving our desired outcomes.

We have developed a crushingly complex mountain of regulations trying—presumably with good intentions—to meet our diverse constituents’ needs. However, what we need are fewer, simpler programs with the adaptive flexibility to enable customization and personalization. It’s time for our governments to restructure so that they can meet each unique citizen where they are—not with an overwhelming number of rigid programs, but rather with more simple and agile systems which are relentlessly adjusted for usability and outcomes. 

What user-friendly government looks like

Today, I have hope that a growing movement is fighting to move public systems into a more human-centered 21st century that is focused on results. Several policy ideas exemplify this transition.

First, is an expanded concept of personalization in education called “success planning.” National organizations that promote place-based cross-sector collaborations, including models like the Harlem Children’s Zone, recognize that we will never achieve educational equity by only focusing on the 20% of time that children are in school. Instead, these new systems ensure that students receive personalized care in all aspects of their lives.

Success planning provides each student with a navigator who co-creates a unique plan of action with each child, their family, educators, and other caring adults. Implemented and adjusted over the years, this relationship-based approach ensures children get what they need, both in and out of school, to achieve the desired end result: successful futures.

Second, guaranteed income and other cash transfer programs recognize that flexible unconditional cash can be the most efficient way to move people out of poverty and into self-sufficiency. Families and political leaders alike are frustrated with the plethora of specialized social programs whose cumulative requirements have made claiming public benefits its own full-time job. A poor family must go through each program’s arduous process to receive each initiative’s specialized assistance. For example, there is one program that helps with baby food (WIC), another for adult food (SNAP), another for child care, another for housing, etc. The concept of a guaranteed income is old, but the growing movement is new—with lessons available from 150 cash-provision initiatives like Magnolia Mothers and 72 local government-sponsored pilots like Stockton SEED. . These flexible cash programs have been found to not only reduce economic hardship, but also show unexpected benefits, including improved mental wellbeing, increased housing mobility, better access to child care and elder care, more up-skilling among workers, and higher grades for children.

Efforts to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit work similarly, because they give people the agency to meet their unique needs, which change over time, and chart their own path to self-sufficiency. The temporary expansion of these tax credits during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic are credited with profound reductions in child poverty. It was, in effect, a customizable public benefit able to meet each individual family’s unique needs.

Finally, the abundance movement is a growing community led by Democrats who believe we must remove the bureaucratic obstacles that limit people’s access to the things government should be accountable for creating, like affordable housing, well-paying jobs, and quality education. These leaders recognize that our government’s complex and numerous programs may have each been well-intentioned, but that the cumulative impact over time has created unnecessarily complicated services, which disadvantage those without the resources or time to navigate them. They fear we have created a political and public sector culture that values procedural compliance over outcomes. And one of the abundance movement’s most prominent leaders is none other than Jennifer Pahlka, the same one who inspired me twenty years ago with her vision of a government so user-friendly that we’d love it as much as we love our smartphones.

Success planning, guaranteed income, and the abundance movement all seek to create user-focused, responsive public systems that deliver meaningful results for each unique person they serve, not just the ones who fit into rigid regulatory boxes or who have the time and money to navigate complex programs. They are evidence of progress and hope at a time when many of us need it.

We must urgently improve the capacity of our government before others destroy it. It is how we start rebuilding trust in government, and perhaps even come to love it.



source https://time.com/7206205/what-trumps-election-tells-us-about-the-user-experience-of-government/

2025年1月12日 星期日

What Ignited the Deadly California Wildfires? Investigators Consider Array of Possibilities

California Wildfires

LOS ANGELES — Investigators are considering an array of possible ignition sources for the huge fires that have killed at least 16 people and destroyed thousands of homes and businesses in the Los Angeles area.

In hilly, upscale Pacific Palisades, home to Hollywood stars like Jamie Lee Curtis and Billy Crystal who lost houses in the fire, officials have placed the origin of the wind-whipped blaze behind a home on Piedra Morada Drive, which sits above a densely wooded arroyo.

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

While lightning is the most common source of fires in the U.S., according to the National Fire Protection Association, investigators were able to rule that out quickly. There were no reports of lightning in the Palisades area or the terrain around the Eaton Fire, which started in east Los Angeles County and has also destroyed hundreds of homes.

The next two most common causes: fires intentionally set, and those sparked by utility lines.

Read More: What We Know About the Arrest Made Near the Kenneth Fire in L.A.

John Lentini, owner of Scientific Fire Analysis in Florida, who has investigated large fires in California including the Oakland Hills Fire in 1991, said the size and scope of the blaze doesn’t change the approach to finding out what caused it.

“This was once a small fire,” Lentini said. “People will focus on where the fire started, determine the origin and look around the origin and determine the cause.”

So far there has been no official indication of arson in either blaze, and utility lines have not yet been identified as a cause either.

Utilities are required to report to the California Public Utilities Commission when they know of “electric incidents potentially associated with a wildfire,” Terrie Prosper, the commission’s communications director, said via email. CPUC staff then investigate to see if there were violations of state law.

The 2017 Thomas Fire, one of the largest fires in state history, was sparked by Southern California Edison power lines that came into contact during high wind, investigators determined. The blaze killed two people and charred more than 440 square miles (1,140 square kilometers).

On Friday, Southern California Edison filed a report with the CPUC related to the Eaton Fire in the hills near Pasadena, an area the utility serves.

Edison said it has not received any suggestions that its equipment was involved in the ignition of that fire, but that it filed the report with state utilities regulators out of “an abundance of caution” after receiving evidence preservation notices from insurance company lawyers.

Read More: L.A. Fires Show the Reality of Living in a World with 1.5°C of Warming

“Preliminary analysis by SCE of electrical circuit information for the energized transmission lines going through the area for 12 hours prior to the reported start time of the fire shows no interruptions or electrical or operational anomalies until more than one hour after the reported start time of the fire,” the utility reported.

While lightning, arson and utility lines are the most common causes, debris burning and fireworks are also common causes.

But fires are incited by myriad sources, including accidents.

In 2021, a couple’s gender reveal stunt started a large fire that torched close to 36 square miles (about 90 square kilometers) of terrain, destroyed five homes and 15 other buildings and claimed the life of a firefighter, Charlie Morton.

The Eaton and Palisades fires were still burning with little containment on Friday. Winds softened, but there was no rain in the forecast as the flames moved through miles of dry landscape.

“It’s going to go out when it runs out of fuel, or when the weather stops,” Lentini said. “They’re not going to put that thing out until it’s ready to go out.”



source https://time.com/7206376/what-ignited-southern-california-los-angeles-wildfires-investigation/

من هشت سال گروگان ایران بودم. آیا دوستانم از بمباران اسرائیل جان سالم به در بردند؟

Read this story in English here نمازی گروگان سابق آمریکایی در ایران است و اکنون عضو هیئت مشاوران ابتکار آزادی برای زندانیان سیاسی در...